I am developing a rocket ( near flight ready), which may not need fins.
The CG of the rocket (not currently measured precisely) sits at least the diameter of the main body above the CP position.
This was achieved through shoving everything of significant mass right to the top of the nose.
Am I missing something? Because from my view the rocket could produce a stable flight without fins.
Thoughts?
Finless Rocket
-
- WRA2 Member
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2018 1:53 pm
-
- WRA2 Member
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2015 7:32 am
Re: Finless Rocket
In the coast phase it would be stable. Your problem would be the boost phase.
Nothing can stop a curious mind from inventing- Anonymous
-
- WRA2 Member
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 2:18 pm
Re: Finless Rocket
Yes, the CG needs to be ahead of the CP when the rocket has water mass in it.
-
- WRA2 Member
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2018 1:53 pm
Re: Finless Rocket
I don't think that's the case, at least when the rocket is full, because the boost phase is very short and to bring the cp behind the CG at this point would require unrealistically large fins.
-
- WRA2 Member
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 2:18 pm
Re: Finless Rocket
All I can say is, experiment. Yes, the boost phase is short, but when your rocket is traveling at 180mph for about 0.1 sec, it'll be about 25 feet in the air, plenty of time for wind forces to turn the rocket before it becomes stable. But there's a chance, with a rocket that is well balanced along its central axis, that it will go straight long enough for the water mass to disappear and your rocket be stable.
I am reminded of an experiment my brother in law did at a civil war artillery range (he has his own cannons). Instead of firing a lead ball, he attached the ball to a metal tube the same diameter as the ball, with the idea that the projectile would be very nose-heavy with a lightweight cylinder trailing behind. Good in theory, but in practice the projectile waggled tail as it flew, evidenced by the projectile hitting the target on its side rather than straight on. The barrel wasn't rifled so there was no spinning stability, just aerodynamics. Fins would have helped. The cylinder of a rocket body doesn't really provide a good weathervane effect.
I'd say, try it out. That's what this hobby is all about after all. Build a finless test rocket with some ballast in the nose and see what happens.
I am reminded of an experiment my brother in law did at a civil war artillery range (he has his own cannons). Instead of firing a lead ball, he attached the ball to a metal tube the same diameter as the ball, with the idea that the projectile would be very nose-heavy with a lightweight cylinder trailing behind. Good in theory, but in practice the projectile waggled tail as it flew, evidenced by the projectile hitting the target on its side rather than straight on. The barrel wasn't rifled so there was no spinning stability, just aerodynamics. Fins would have helped. The cylinder of a rocket body doesn't really provide a good weathervane effect.
I'd say, try it out. That's what this hobby is all about after all. Build a finless test rocket with some ballast in the nose and see what happens.