Project 'Fire mouse over the Thames'
-
- WRA2 Member
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 6:02 am
Re: Project 'Fire mouse over the Thames'
i vote glider
Ascender Water Rockets
http://ascenderwaterrockets.weebly.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCS2NHXS-VFxEux70DCINR0w
http://ascenderwaterrockets.weebly.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCS2NHXS-VFxEux70DCINR0w
-
- WRA2 Member
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:33 am
Re: Project 'Fire mouse over the Thames'
I think the glider idea is good to. it's stable, and would almost guaranty a moderately level flight, and reasonable g forces. although with an egg, the pod would work. i do not have pictures, but I helped my brother do this in high school
-
- WRA2 Member
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 1:40 am
Re: Project 'Fire mouse over the Thames'
I vote glider too.Andrewlee wrote:I think the glider idea is good to. it's stable, and would almost guaranty a moderately level flight, and reasonable g forces. although with an egg, the pod would work. i do not have pictures, but I helped my brother do this in high school
But I had a totally new idea for fabricating the glider. I suggest that you look up paragliders. You could deploy one from apogee and with a simple r/c servo control you can steer the glider as far as you need to go. If there's some wind you can actually climb in altitude as you fly.
Bill W.
Team Seneca
Team Seneca
-
- WRA2 Member
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:33 am
Re: Project 'Fire mouse over the Thames'
But sticking to the guide lines of cheapness and effectiveness, the fixed wing glider, or a safety pod would work. Although, I am prone to the likeness of Radio Controlled as well.
-
- WRA2 Member
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:44 am
Re: Project 'Fire mouse over the Thames'
I think Bill's idea has a lot of merit. A parasail wing would deploy on apogee using any of the methods that have been very thoroughly shaken out over the years. The thing that makes the idea so appealing is because the parasail is cloth, so it won't get ruined in a crash and it would be folded up inside the rocket during the boost phase and therefore will not be damaged by the air or have any influence on the rocket's trajectory.Andrewlee wrote:But sticking to the guide lines of cheapness and effectiveness, the fixed wing glider, or a safety pod would work. Although, I am prone to the likeness of Radio Controlled as well.
Tim Chen
Captain, Team Enterprise
Captain, Team Enterprise
-
- WRA2 Member
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:33 am
Re: Project 'Fire mouse over the Thames'
The biggest problem with a para sail is control. and to do that, it would require remote control. And that starts to make it expensive. But, if there were a way you could do this, that would direct the rocket over the river, regardless of wind (speeds of wind taken to account...not talking of 25kt winds) that do not require radio control, that would be cheap, effective, and freakishly awesome
-
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:14 pm
Re: Project 'Fire mouse over the Thames'
This is probably the only situation we would use the complicated paraglider, because, as mentioned, it would be expensive and complicated and I'm lazy. My idea of a glider rocket is a rocket with some wings attached, the wings simply being triangular shaped pieces of a suitable material, so any improvements to the glider design would be appreciatedAndrewlee wrote:The biggest problem with a para sail is control. and to do that, it would require remote control. And that starts to make it expensive. But, if there were a way you could do this, that would direct the rocket over the river, regardless of wind (speeds of wind taken to account...not talking of 25kt winds) that do not require radio control, that would be cheap, effective, and freakishly awesome
-
- WRA2 Member
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 11:06 am
Re: Project 'Fire mouse over the Thames'
Holy smokes! I thought I would be helpful and google for some plans to see if it's been done and I found this site that sells one of these exact things!Andrewlee wrote:The biggest problem with a para sail is control. and to do that, it would require remote control. And that starts to make it expensive. But, if there were a way you could do this, that would direct the rocket over the river, regardless of wind (speeds of wind taken to account...not talking of 25kt winds) that do not require radio control, that would be cheap, effective, and freakishly awesome
http://www.rcparamodels.com
They have some videos linked at the bottom of the page. it looks like they fly it up and drop it out of an R/C plane and wow it looks like a BLAST to fly. If you could get one of these things up about 100 meters you could fly the thing for miles and miles and do stunts while you're at it! It only needs a 2-channel controller and can do all that!
Check it out! I'm very tempted to buy one.
Spaceman Spiff
"What goes up, must come down"
"What goes up, must come down"
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:21 pm
Re: Project 'Fire mouse over the Thames'
Those videos do look cool. You know something? r/c parachutes with no motor are to r/c planes what water rockets are to pyro rockets. A really niche segment. Thanks for sharing the link!
Andromeda
No matter where you go, there you are.
- Buckaroo Bansia
No matter where you go, there you are.
- Buckaroo Bansia
-
- WRA2 Member
- Posts: 1778
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 3:24 pm
Re: Project 'Fire mouse over the Thames'
That looks like a lot of fun.
Do they make radio controls that will work from 3000+ feet distance?
Do they make radio controls that will work from 3000+ feet distance?
Team U.S. Water Rockets
Visit USWaterRockets.com
Visit our Blog
Tune in to our YouTube Channel
Visit our Facebook page
Visit our Twitter Page
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. --Thomas Edison
Visit USWaterRockets.com
Visit our Blog
Tune in to our YouTube Channel
Visit our Facebook page
Visit our Twitter Page
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. --Thomas Edison
-
- WRA2 Member
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:33 am
Re: Project 'Fire mouse over the Thames'
Yes, most RC Airplane Remotes (gas powered, often can work up to a mile away.
-
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:14 pm
Re: Project 'Fire mouse over the Thames'
Looks cool
But back on topic: What sort of glider should I use to rocket my mouse across?
But back on topic: What sort of glider should I use to rocket my mouse across?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:21 pm
Re: Project 'Fire mouse over the Thames'
What about those huge foam gliders that they sell in the hobby store? It's big enough to soar a long way?Rusty wrote:Looks cool
But back on topic: What sort of glider should I use to rocket my mouse across?
Andromeda
No matter where you go, there you are.
- Buckaroo Bansia
No matter where you go, there you are.
- Buckaroo Bansia
-
- WRA2 Member
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:33 am
Re: Project 'Fire mouse over the Thames'
that, or else you could find plans for "the Gentle Lady" it is a Gordon design. They also did the The Eagle and the Eagle 2. You could take the wing design off of that. I just like the designs.
-
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:14 pm
Re: Project 'Fire mouse over the Thames'
A thought just occurred to me. Wouldn't attaching a water rocket to a glider, such as 'the gentle lady' mentioned, make it quite unstable as i would have thought that if you applied force to a glider it would be quite unpredictable.
Also, the designs mentioned seem bigger than I was planning to make. I was also more planning of attaching glider parts to a water rocket, rather than attaching a rocket to a glider, as we were trying to make as much of it ourselves as would be possible, and the plans mentioned seem to emphasis buying a glider rather than building a rocket.
I was wondering if a design where some wings were attached to the rocket in such a way that as the rocket was travelling at speed (ie taking off) the wings would be folded in, then when the rocket stops moving as fast (ie at apogee) the wings unfold and the rocket turns into a glider.
Also, the designs mentioned seem bigger than I was planning to make. I was also more planning of attaching glider parts to a water rocket, rather than attaching a rocket to a glider, as we were trying to make as much of it ourselves as would be possible, and the plans mentioned seem to emphasis buying a glider rather than building a rocket.
I was wondering if a design where some wings were attached to the rocket in such a way that as the rocket was travelling at speed (ie taking off) the wings would be folded in, then when the rocket stops moving as fast (ie at apogee) the wings unfold and the rocket turns into a glider.